Lately I've gotten frustrated by my addiction to reading investment articles of the debt/doom/gloom genre, and it is a genre. Scary stories sell. They are a cheap way of drawing attention. In fact this technique is fairly universal. It keeps insurance companies in business; it's exploited by politicians in order to keep or augment their power; and it sells newspapers. ("If it bleeds, it leads.")
Doom-and-gloom might in fact be the only truly recession-proof industry.
If you watch a TV weather forecast, even in the desert Southwest, the "meteorologist" (who usually looks like a former model) tenses up her voice about a chance of rain, and then they break to commercial.
Long ago, environmentalists perfected the use of gloom and doom prophecies to scare people into their dream of a centrally-planned economy. (Planned by them, of course.)
In some ways I prefer the classic "End Times" warnings of Bible Christians to all of their secular imitators. Urban sophisticates on the coasts dismiss Bible thumpers as uneducated, gun-toting, hayseeds of the hinterlands, but actually a prophetic orientation shows a certain astuteness.
Religions that worship a holy book are quite vulnerable, in a way. Their Book is a stationary target that scientists, historians, archeologists and philosophers gradually pick apart.
And that is the remarkable utility of prophecy: it hasn't happened yet, so how can you disprove it? Not only that, but the wording leaves a lot of wiggle room. The longer the end of the world gets postponed, the more the suckers believe it.
It remains to be seen whether the Jeremiahs of Global Warming will profit from 2000 years of Christian eschatology and flim-flam. Can they use these time-honored cultural rhythms to their advantage, or will they be gored by real data? The only thing that I'm sure about is that if they run into problems they can skedaddle off--Elmer Gantry-like (*)-- to the next crisis du jour, and will even be introduced as "experts" on TV shows; their past record will be as forgotten as yesterday's news.
So why do I pay any attention to the doom and gloom crowd in the investment world? They are a countervailing force that serves to keep me from getting fooled by dishonest accounting, government cheerleaders, or the commission-earning boosterism of Wall Street.
And sometimes the doom and gloomers are right, even spectacularly so, such as the last two years. On the other hand, a broken clock gives the right time twice a day.
[*] Recently I saw the movie "Elmer Gantry", made about 1960, starring Burt Lancaster and Shirley Jones. Delightful. Lancaster deserved his Oscar.
|
|
||||||||
|
We Love Comments!
Skip Login/Contact Boxes to be Anonymous.
Recent Photos
Month Archive
Login
|
The Doom and Gloom Racket
by
theBoonie
on Thu 30 Jul 2009 10:29 AM MDT | Permanent Link
Keywords:
SocietyAndCulture
Comments
Re: The Doom and Gloom Racket
by
GrannyJ
on Thu 30 Jul 2009 04:37 PM MDT | Permanent Link
End Times is a lot less threatening IF the prophets are part of a minority group; when they get too big, they're as dangerous (or more so) than His Goreship. Frankly, give me the days of old fashioned hero worship -- despite that James Thurber story, admiring heroes is a lot healthier for a society than scurrying around to avoid dragons on every hand. And it gives the media something positive to fixate on. ( and, no, I do not mean celebs.) At least that's my take.
Re: Re: The Doom and Gloom Racket
by
theBoonie
on Thu 30 Jul 2009 07:31 PM MDT | Profile | Permanent Link
Granny J, just to jog your memory, Elmer Gantry was written by Sinclair Lewis. I'm feeling inspired enough to read it, after seeing the movie.
Re: The Doom and Gloom Racket
by
Anonymous
on Fri 31 Jul 2009 02:02 AM MDT | Permanent Link
Saw Elmer Gantry shortly after it's release in 1960 and read the book. At that young age I was deeply impressed and it created a lifelong wariness of charlatans and wish to find out things for myself. I despair of the fact that narcissism, intolerance and hypocrisy in the western world has not diminished since the book came out but only increased. Why do evangelicals and blogjeremiahs think they know best and want to impose it upon others? m Re: Re: The Doom and Gloom Racket
by
theBoonie
on Fri 31 Jul 2009 07:23 AM MDT | Profile | Permanent Link
M, OK now I am going to read that book, as obsolete as that idea is.
"Blogjeremiahs think they know best." Hmmm. Wonder what that means. Re: The Doom and Gloom Racket
by
Maureen
on Sat 01 Aug 2009 10:20 AM MDT | Permanent Link
The D & M genre is a good "countervailing force"! Are the economists the antonym of soothsayers? How can the masses be so blind?
|
Contact author
Email author at:
occupation_of_independence@yahoo.com
Search
Recent Articles
Links
|
||||||